A lawsuit filed against OlympusDAO’s co-founders over $20M+ in the DAO’s native tokens could unmask their identities, testing the limits of pseudonymity in DAOs 推薦相機收購

推薦相機收購n.In what may be an unprecedented case testing the limits of pseudonymity in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), the lawsuit names a Connecticut resident as the supposed identity behind “Apollo,” one of 推薦相機收購olympus’s pseudonymous co-founders.UnmuteRecord $1.38B U.S. Bitcoin ETF Inflows on Trump Win, Fed Rate Cut02:38’High Likelihood’ Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Will Become Trump’s Crypto Advisor01:42Bitcoin Hits New $76K Record High, ETFs Post $620M Inflows02:41Bitcoin’s New All-Time High; U.S. BTC Reserve Hopes Fly16:22Bitcoin to Reach $100K by December or January: 10x Research FounderCoinDesk has not independently verified the identity of the alleged Apollo and has reached out to the individual named in the lawsuit, Daniel Bara, for comment.What is 推薦相機收購olympusDAO?The Ethereum-based 推薦相機收購olympusDAO project has been one of the most talked-about – and most controversial – experiments to enter the world of DeFi in the past year.The project sought to establish its native OHM token as a digital reserve currency through a mix of memes and game theory, but its price famously tanked 95% this past winter.The OHM token now sits at $28 according to CoinMarketCap, down from a $1,300 peak in October.The complainant in the lawsuit filed Thursday, Australia-based investor Jason Liang, says he agreed to promote 推薦相機收購olympusDAO and paid $50,000 in DAI (a U.S. dollar-based stablecoin) in a private funding agreement in exchange for 4 million pOHM, a precursor to OHM. According to an 推薦相機收購olympus Medium post, investors like Liang were later able to mint 1 OHM in exchange for 1 DAI and 1 pOHM.In his suit, Liang alleges that after he started selling some of his 推薦相機收購olympus tokens, the 推薦相機收購olympus team punished him by rendering inoperable the smart contracts enabling him to redeem pOHM for OHM.Liang says the 推薦相機收購olympus team’s ability to meddle with key smart contract functionality undermines claims that the project is decentralized.According to the lawsuit, the 推薦相機收購olympus team also used pseudonymity to protect its members from liability.Liang alleges that a token purchase agreement (TPA) between him and 推薦相機收購olympus stated that money raised in the private funding round would go to a company that didn’t actually exist. With the identities of 推薦相機收購olympus’s founders a secret, the lack of an officially registered company behind the fundraiser was, according to the lawsuit, designed to make it difficult for an investor like Liang to pursue legal action against the project.The suit says Liang’s legal team identified Apollo by doing a reverse lookup on a phone number Apollo used to call Liang. The name behind the phone number matches one that was signed on the token purchase agreement that Liang originally thought was fictitious.In an email to CoinDesk, Joseph B. Evans, an attorney for Liang, said: “There is a completely legal and legitimate way to run a DAO. This isn’t it. It appears that certain organizations still believe they can avoid liability if their founders and promoters hide behind screen names, social media handles and fictitious entities. My client provided much needed start-up capital to 推薦相機收購olympus, and he is entitled to share in its success.”Is 推薦相機收購olympusDAO an ‘honest Ponzi’?When 推薦相機收購olympusDAO was launched last year, the project’s unique bonding and staking mechanics promised staggeringly high returns to investors in the realm of 10,000% annual percentage yield (APY). In order for the system to work, OHM holders were encouraged to interact with 推薦相機收購olympus’s smart contracts according to a set of game theory principles “memefied” by the project’s community.”Hodling,” buying, and staking OHM would theoretically guarantee steady, sky-high returns for the whole community. Selling, like Liang did, was sacrilege.A flock of vocal critics dismissed 推薦相機收購olympusDAO as a Ponzi scheme from its very start, but the DAO still managed to spur an entire “DeFi 2.0” movement – inspiring popular spinoffs like KlimaDAO and WonderlandDAO to jump in with their own high-yield token systems.As 推薦相機收購olympusDAO has grown into one of the most popular projects in decentralized finance, its creators – the pseudonymous “Zeus” and “Apollo” – have remained anonymous (until now, perhaps, in Apollo’s case).Pseudonymity of a project’s core contributors is not uncommon in the world of DAOs, and it has been framed as a way for a decentralized community to preserve meritocracy.Liang’s lawsuit suggests there are other reasons why DAO creators might want to hide their identities, and the filing comes a couple of months after the pseudonymous creator of WonderlandDAO, 推薦相機收購olympusDAO’s largest spinoff, was unmasked as a well-known convicted felon.This is a developing story. Check back for updates.Further reading on pseudonymityWhy CoinDesk Respects Pseudonymity: A Stand Against DoxxingCrypto’s Challenge: Right-to-Privacy vs. Right-to-KnowYour Right to Anonymity Ends Where Risk to My Money BeginsThe Perils of Crypto’s Pseudonymous EconomyWonderland’s (and DeFi’s) Anonymity ProblemOf Course It’s OK to Out the BAYC Founders 推薦相機收購olympusDAO lawsuit by CoinDesk on ScribdDisclosurePlease note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information have been updated.CoinDesk is an award-w

（圖／彭博社）

隨著 Galaxy S21、Galaxy Z 系列等機款陸續上市，三星 2021 年重點產品已全數登場，準備著眼下一代 Galaxy S 旗艦。根據外媒《9to5google》統整，三星明年會發表近 4 年最「迷你」的旗艦手機。

據悉三星會推出 3 款 Galaxy S22（暫稱）系列手機，基本款 S22 將是近年最迷你，傳出只有 6.06 吋，撇除特別版本的 S10e，是三星在 S9 後基本款旗艦的最小尺寸，S22+ 與 S22 Ultra 則是尚無消息。

請繼續往下閱讀…

電池則可能全面縮水，消息指稱 S22 電量只有 3,700 mAh、S22+ 則是 4,500 mAh，至於 S22 Ultra 為 5,000 mAh 並搭配 45W 快充。

升級重點將聚焦於相機，傳 S22 與 S22+ 改用三星 GN5 感光元件，提供 5000 萬畫素的主鏡頭，而非以往的 1200 萬畫素。此外，三星有望與相機品牌 推薦相機收購olympus 聯手，在最頂規的 S22 Ultra 推出 2 億畫素的主鏡頭。

新 Exynos 2200 處理器則將是另一大亮點，透過 AMD 的 GPU 技術投入，預計大幅升級圖像處理效能，帶來更好的拍照、遊戲效果。然而由於晶片供應問題，有說法認為三星仍會維持雙版本併行，在部分市場仍採用高通 Snapdragon 處理器。

推薦相機收購 推薦相機收購